Alternatives

ProgressCue vs Jellyfish

A lightweight, GitHub-native alternative to Jellyfish

Start free All features
ProgressCue - Home
Home
Platform TeamAll Repositories
Current State
In-Progress PRs
9
Pending-Review PRs
4
Stale PRs (> 7 days)
3
Large PRs (> 400 lines)
2
PR TitleRepositoryAuthorStatusDays OpenLinesFiles
Add retry budget to webhook workerapiAKPending Review2+184 −226
Split billing service into modulesbillingCWPending Review4+1,240 −86018
Fix flaky auth test on CIwebBOPending Review9+36 −122
Migrate settings page to HTMXwebDMPending Review1+412 −39011
Action Items
←→View Detailed Metrics →
!

PR #123 “Fix auth” from @alice has been waiting 14 days with no reviews or comments.

api · stale
↕

PR #456 “Refactor API” has 2,300 lines changed across 15 files. Consider splitting it into smaller PRs.

web · large PR
Jellyfish

Why teams switch from Jellyfish

Jellyfish is built for enterprise, but many teams need something faster and more focused.

  • Enterprise-first pricing puts it out of reach for most engineering teams
  • Onboarding takes weeks with dedicated implementation support required
  • Built for executive reporting rather than day-to-day engineering decisions
  • Requires connecting multiple data sources before delivering value
ProgressCue

Why choose ProgressCue

Get GitHub-native analytics without the enterprise overhead.

  • GitHub-native setup — connect your repos and go
  • Designed for engineering teams, not just executive dashboards
  • Weekly Slack reports keep insights where your team already works
  • Free beta access with no enterprise sales process
Side by side

Feature comparison

FeatureProgressCueJellyfish
GitHub integration ✓ ✓
DORA metrics ✓ ✓
Cycle time analytics ✓ ✓
Code review breakdown ✓ —
AI impact tracking ✓ —
CI/CD visibility ✓ ✓
Weekly Slack reports ✓ —
Free tier available ✓ —
Setup time Minutes Weeks

See what needs your attention.

Bring your GitHub activity into view. Free during beta. No credit card required.

Start free